nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 03, v.33 381-385
宫腔粘连的影响因素及术后患者心理状况的分析
基金项目(Foundation): 南充市科技项目(市校科技战略合作专项19SXHZ0338)
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
投稿时间: 2023-10-23
投稿日期(年): 2023
修回时间: 2023-12-15
终审时间: 2024-01-31
终审日期(年): 2024
审稿周期(年): 1
发布时间: 2024-03-15
出版时间: 2024-03-15
移动端阅读
摘要:

目的 探索宫腔粘连(IUA)的影响因素并分析IUA患者术后的心理状况。方法 回顾性分析2020年1月1日至2021年8月31日在川北医学院附属医院行宫腔镜下宫腔粘连分离术(TCRA)的220例IUA患者的临床资料,并于术后2年通过电话或门诊随访患者的人口统计学特征、月经改善情况,并采用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)及抑郁量表(HAMD)评估患者的心理状况。根据患者的术前宫腔粘连程度分组(轻度92例、中度76例、重度52例),统计分析各组间的差异。结果 轻、中、重度粘连组中夫妻关系好者占比分别为79.35%、55.26%、42.31%,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);重度粘连组宫腔操作次数显著高于轻度、中度粘连组(P<0.05),而轻度、中度粘连组间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后2年,轻、中、重度粘连组月经改善总有效率分别为90.22%、78.95%、63.46%,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),轻度粘连组改善最明显。术后2年,轻、中、重度粘连组HAMA评分分别为(6.29±4.42)分、(7.83±5.31)分、(8.54±5.14)分,HAMD评分分别为(6.10±4.51)分、(8.00±5.55)分、(8.77±5.72)分,其中轻度粘连组HAMA、HAMD评分均显著低于中度、重度粘连组(P<0.05),而中度与重度粘连组间HAMA、HAMD评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 夫妻关系及宫腔操作次数是IUA的重要影响因素,夫妻关系越好者宫腔粘连程度越轻,宫腔内操作频次越高者重度粘连发生率越高;术前粘连程度影响术后患者月经改善情况及心理状况,术前粘连程度轻者术后月经改善程度更好、焦虑/抑郁状况更轻。

Abstract:

KeyWords:
参考文献

[1] Asherman JG.Traumatic intra-uterine adhesions[J].J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp,1950,57:892-896.

[2] Mo X,Qin G,Zhou Z,et al.Assessment of risk factors of intrauterine adhesions in patients with induced abortion and the curative effect of hysteroscopic surgery[J].J Invest Surg,2019,32:85-89.

[3] Wang T,Zhou Y,Fu J,et al.Level of depression,anxiety and stress in patients with intrauterine adhesions in Hunan Province,China:a cross-sectional study[J/OL].PLoS One,2020,15:e0229832.

[4] Paul S,Abbas MS,Nassar ST,et al.Correlation of anxiety and depression to the development of gastroesophageal disease in the younger population[J].Cureus,2022,14:e32712.

[5] Batmaz SB,Birinci G,Aslan EA.Quality of life of children with allergic disease:the effect of depression and anxiety of children and their mothers[J].Asthma,2022,59:1776-1786.

[6] Alshelleh S,Alhouri A,Taifour A,et al.Prevelance of depression and anxiety with their effect on quality of life in chronic kidney disease patients[J].Sci Rep,2022,12:17627.

[7] 夏智勇,颜彤,刘佳淑,等.聚乳酸应用于宫腔镜下中重度宫腔粘连患者分离术后临床效果[J].安徽医学,2023,44:561-565.

[8] The American Fertility Society.The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions,distaltubal occlusion,tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation,tubal pregnancies,müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions[J].Fertil Steril,1988,49:944-955.

[9] 范肖东,汪向东,于欣,等.世界卫生组织ICD-10精神与行为障碍分类临床描述与诊断要点[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1993:140.

[10] 段泉泉,胜利.焦虑及抑郁自评量表的临床效度[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2012,26:676-679.

[11] Omani-Samani R,Maroufizadeh S,Almasi-Hashiani A,et al.Prevalence of depression and its determinant factors among infertile patients in Iran based on the PHQ-9[J].Middle East Fertil Soc J,2018,23:460-463.

[12] Maroufizadeh S,Karimi E,Vesali S,et al.Anxiety and depression after failure of assisted reproductive treatment among patients experiencing infertility[J].Int J Gynecol Obstet,2015,130:253-256.

[13] 王燕尔,曾艳梅,胡惠敏.宫腔粘连患者宫腔镜术后复发的危险因素分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2021,36:306-309.

[14] Liu L,Yang H,Guo Y,et al.The impact of chronic endometritis on endometrial fibrosis and reproductive prognosis in patients with moderate and severe intrauterine adhesions:a prospective cohort study[J].Fertil Steril,2019,111:1002-1010.

[15] Huang X,Wang Y,Wang Y,et al.Prevalence and factors associated with trajectories of antenatal depression:a prospective multi-center cohort study in Chengdu,China[J].BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2023,23:358.

[16] 陈芳,张颖,成九梅.中-重度宫腔粘连分离术后妊娠结局分析[J].国际妇产科学杂志,2019,46:326-330.

[17] Adamson NA.Emotionally focused therapy with couples facing breast cancer:a theoretical foundation and descriptive case study[J].J Psychosoc Oncol,2013,31:712-726.

[18] 周朝.中重度宫腔粘连术后再粘连影响因素分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2021,36:2126-2168.

[19] Cao J,Liu D,Zhao S,et al.Estrogen attenuates TGF-β1-induced EMT in intrauterine adhesion by activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway[J].Braz J Med Biol Res,2020,53:e9794.

[20] 周丽,黄平,黄勤华,等.高剂量雌孕激素序贯联合球囊导尿管放置治疗宫腔镜术后宫腔粘连患者临床疗效[J].临床军医杂志,2023,51:807-809,813.

[21] 包媛媛,洛若愚.宫腔粘连分离术后辅助治疗研究进展[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2019,11:3-6.

[22] Hamiltion M.Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illiness[J].Br J Soc Clin Psychol,1967,6:278-296.

[23] 杨欢,陈玉清.宫腔粘连患者术后3个月的焦虑抑郁状况与生存质量[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2017,31:115-117.

[24] 谢美连,王绮雯,张玉红.优质护理对重度宫腔粘连宫腔镜电切术后患者心理状况、生活质量及疼痛的影响分析[J].中国社区医师,2021,37:142-143.

基本信息:

中图分类号:R713.4

引用信息:

[1]颜彤,夏智勇,刘胜凤,等.宫腔粘连的影响因素及术后患者心理状况的分析[J].生殖医学杂志,2024,33(03):381-385.

基金信息:

南充市科技项目(市校科技战略合作专项19SXHZ0338)

投稿时间:

2023-10-23

投稿日期(年):

2023

修回时间:

2023-12-15

终审时间:

2024-01-31

终审日期(年):

2024

审稿周期(年):

1

发布时间:

2024-03-15

出版时间:

2024-03-15

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文