| 217 | 6 | 73 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的探讨短时授精是否可以改善受精状况、胚胎质量和胚胎种植能力。方法回顾性分析2018年9月至2019年6月在唐都医院生殖医学中心行体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)助孕的患者资料共2 265个周期,根据授精时间长短分为短时授精组(n=1 066)与常规IVF授精组(n=1 199),比较两组患者的受精率、正常受精率、优质胚胎率、囊胚形成率及胚胎种植率差异。结果与常规IVF授精组相比,短时授精组的受精率(81.79%vs. 77.79%)、正常受精率(73.95%vs. 68.78%)显著增加;进一步细化受精率指标显示,短时授精组的2PN受精率显著高于常规IVF授精组(P<0.01),而异常受精指标3PN受精率和0PN受精率则显著低于常规IVF授精组(P<0.01)。D3胚胎结局方面,两组之间的优胚率(55.93%vs. 56.09%)无显著性差异,但是短时授精组的胚胎种植率则显著高于常规IVF授精组(39.98%vs. 30.48%)(P<0.01)。囊胚培养结果显示,与常规IVF授精组相比,短时授精组的囊胚形成率(73.64%vs. 61.47%)、优质囊胚率(66.55%vs. 54.20%)和优质囊胚形成率(49.01%vs. 33.32%)均显著升高(P<0.01)。结论短时授精可以显著改善受精率、囊胚质量和胚胎种植能力。
Abstract:Objective:To explore whether short-term insemination can improve fertilization status,embryo quality and embryo implantation ability.Methods:The data of 2 265 cycles of patients undergone IVF-ET assisted pregnancy at Tangdu Hospital Reproductive Medicine Center from September 2018 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into short-term insemination group(n=1 066) and the conventional IVF insemination group(n=1 199) according to the time length of fertilization. The fertilization rate,normal fertilization rate,high-quality embryo rate,blastocyst formation rate and embryo implantation rate were compared between the two groups.Results:Compared with the conventional IVF insemination group,the fertilization rate(81.79% vs. 77.79%) and normal fertilization rate(73.95% vs. 68.78%) in the short-term insemination group were increased significantly. Further refinement of the fertilization rate showed that the 2 PN fertilization rate in the short-term insemination group was significantly higher than that of the conventional IVF insemination group(P<0.01),while the abnormal fertilization rate of 3 PN or 0 PN was significantly lower than that of the conventional IVF insemination group(P<0.01). In terms of Day 3 embryo outcome,there was no significant difference in the high quality embryos rate(55.93% vs. 56.09%) between the two groups,but the embryo implantation rate of the short-term insemination group was significantly higher than that of the conventional IVF insemination group(39.98% vs. 30.48%)(P<0.01). The blastocyst culture results showed that the blastocyst formation rate(73.64% vs. 61.47%),high-quality blastocyst rate(66.55% vs. 54.20%) and high-quality blastocyst formation rate(49.01% vs. 33.32%) in the short-term insemination group were significantly increased compared with the conventional IVF insemination group(P<0.01).Conclusions:Short-term insemination can significantly improve the fertilization rate,blastocyst quality and embryo implantation ability.
[1] Hunter P.The long-term health risks of ART:Epidemiological data and research on animals indicate that in vitro fertilization might create health problems later in life[J].EMBO Rep,2017,18:1061-1064.
[2] Shalom-paz E,Alshalati J,Shehata F,et al.Clinical and economic analysis of rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles[J].Gynecol Endocrinol,2011,27:993-996.
[3] Barlow P,Englert Y,Puissant F,et al.Fertilization failure in IVF:why and what next [J].Hum Reprod(Oxford),1990,5:451-456.
[4] Tournaye H,Verheyen G,Albano C,et al.Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus in vitro fertilization:a randomized controlled trial and a meta analysis of the literature[J].Fertil Steril,2002,78:1030-1037.
[5] Bungum L,Bungum M,Humaidan P,et al.A strategy for treatment of couples with unexplained infertility who failed to conceive after intrauterine insemination[J/OL].Reprod Biomed Online,2004,8:584-589.
[6] Kattera S,Chen C.Short co-incubation of gametes in vitro fertilization improves implantation and pregnancy rates:a prospective,randomized,controlled study[J].Fertil Steril,2003,80:1017-1021.
[7] 马学工.常规体外授精短时授精后6 h 行卵胞浆内单精子注射治疗受精失败34 例[J].实用医学杂志,2010,26:986-987.
[8] 陈妍,宋歌,梅艳芳.短时受精失败和低受精率周期的卵母细胞发育潜能对比观察及对妊娠率的影响研究[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2019,27:504-506.
[9] 周晶,李博,陈书强,等.冻融胚胎与新鲜胚胎移植的新生儿结局比较[J].生殖医学杂志,2017,26:9-13.
[10] 中华医学会生殖医学分会第一届实验室学组.人类体外受精-胚胎移植实验室操作专家共识(2016)[J].生殖医学杂志,2017,26:1-8.
[11] 陈希曦,黎淑贞,邓爱民,等.短时受精精卵共孵育时间对受精率的影响[J].国际医药卫生导报,2012,18:1298-1301.
[12] 金海霞,孙莹璞,辛志敏,等.保留卵丘细胞对短时受精结果的影响[J].实用医学杂志,2011,27:3879-3880.
[13] 李国臻,郑波,郭钰英,等.不同时间去除卵丘细胞对短时受精结果的影响[J].山东医药,2015,22:73-75.
[14] 金海霞,孙莹璞.短时受精中多精受精可以避免[J].生殖医学杂志,2011,20:83-85.
[15] 罗平,罗江霞,张会娜.短时受精不同脱颗粒细胞方式对体外受精结局的影响[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2014,22:149-151.
[16] Dimfeld M,Shiloh H,Bider D,et al.A prospective randomized controlled study of the effect of short coincubation of gametes during insemination on zona pellucida thickness[J].Gynecol Endocrinol,2003,17:397-403.
[17] 简启亮,王芳,丁楠,等.短时受精与常规受精在体外受精周期效果的Meta分析[J].中国循证医学杂志,2014,14:1504-1509.
[18] 刁英,杨智敏,谭兵兵,等.短时受精并即刻脱颗粒细胞对IVF-ET治疗周期的影响[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2011,19:106-108,122.
[19] 管荷琴,吕杰强,陈华,等.短时受精与常规受精对体外受精结局的影响[J].实用医学杂志,2012,28:1989-1991.
[20] 章志琴,龙生根,黄志辉,等.短时受精联合早补救ICSI 在辅助生殖技术中的应用研究[J].江西医药,2019,54:215-218.
[21] 国玉蕊,黄国宁,王亚平,等.短时受精改变受精卵透明带结构?——一项前瞻性随机自身对照研究[J].生殖与避孕,2010,30:439-444.
[22] 蒋彦,李莉,赵秀军,等.严重少弱精患者行分半短时IVF/ICSI 受精方式探讨[J].中国妇幼保健,2014,12:1883-1885.
[23] 杨伟娜,孔风云,孙伟.原发不孕患者行短时受精,half-ICSI与常规长时受精结果的比较[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2014,22:127-130.
[24] 吴重聪,许伟标,蔡喆,等.短时受精在高龄女性体外受精-胚胎移植中的应用研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2016,31:2146-2148.
[25] Liu WW,Liu JX,Zhang XD,et al.Short co-incubation of gametes combined with early rescue ICSI:An optimal strategy for complete fertilization failure after IVF[J].Human Fertility,2014,17:50-55.
[26] 谭艳,龙文香,李娟娟,等.早期补救性ICSI新生儿近期安全性的Meta分析[J].生殖医学杂志,2017,26:983-988.
基本信息:
中图分类号:R714.8
引用信息:
[1]李博,贺晓,李丽,等.短时授精显著改善受精率、囊胚形成率和胚胎种植率[J].生殖医学杂志,2020,29(08):1013-1017.
基金信息:
唐都医院科技创新发展基金(2017LCYJ001;2019JSYJ003);; 国家自然科学基金(31801250)
2020-08-15
2020-08-15