| 28 | 0 | 161 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 探讨唾液晚期糖基化终产物(s-AGEs)用于无创监测妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)血糖控制情况的价值,并尝试建立其妊娠特异性临界值体系。方法 本研究为前瞻性随机对照研究。选取2023年1月至2024年12月于本院行常规产前检查的174例妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)患者作为研究组,另选择同时间段于本院行常规产前检查的176例健康妊娠妇女作为对照组,比较2组受试者的一般资料及孕24、28、30、32、34、36周血糖控制水平[包括空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后1 h血糖(1 h PG)、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PG)、葡萄糖目标范围内时间(TIR)];比较2组受试者孕24、28、30、32、34、36周s-AGEs水平。采用Pearson相关性分析探讨s-AGEs与血糖控制水平的相关性;使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析s-AGEs水平对GDM患者血糖控制效果的特异性临界值及预测价值。结果 (1)两组受试者的一般资料比较均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。研究组患者孕24、28、30、32、34、36周FPG、1 h PG、2 h PG及s-AGEs水平均显著高于对照组,TIR均显著低于对照组(P均<0.05);且研究组患者s-AGEs水平随孕周增加呈升高趋势,其中孕24周与孕28周、孕30周与32孕周、孕34周与孕36周差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(2)研究组中血糖控制不达标组患者的s-AGEs水平随孕周增加显著升高(P<0.05),且孕24、28、30、32、34、36周s-AGEs水平均显著高于血糖控制达标组(P<0.05)。(3)Pearson相关性分析结果显示,研究组GDM患者孕24、28、30、32、34、36周s-AGEs水平与FPG、1 h PG、2 h PG分别呈显著正相关,与TIR呈显著负相关(P均<0.05);ROC分析结果显示孕24、28、30、32、34、36周s-AGEs水平预测GDM患者血糖控制效果的临界值分别为8.60 U/mg、8.74 U/mg、8.88 U/mg、8.95 U/mg、9.34 U/mg、9.57 U/mg,各孕周s-AGEs水平联合预测GDM患者血糖控制效果的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)显著高于单独预测(P<0.05)。结论 与健康妊娠妇女相比,GDM患者孕24、28、30、32、34、36周的s-AGEs水平均升高,s-AGEs水平与患者血糖控制水平有关,以上各孕周s-AGEs水平联合检测对GDM患者血糖控制效果的预测价值较高。
Abstract:Objectives:To establish a pregnancy-specific critical value system for non-invasive monitoring of blood glucose control in gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM) based on salivary advanced glycation end products(s-AGEs).Methods:This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial. A total of 174 pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM) who underwent routine prenatal examination in Suqian First People's Hospital from January 2023 to December 2024 were selected as the study group, and 176 healthy pregnant women who underwent routine prenatal examination in the same hospital and during the same period were selected as the control group. The general information of the two groups and their blood glucose control levels at the 24th,28th,30th,32nd,34th and 36th weeks of gestation [fasting plasma glucose(FPG),1 hour postprandial plasma glucose(1 h PG),2 hours postprandial plasma glucose(2 h PG),and glucose time in range(TIR)] were compared. The levels of s-AGEs in two groups at the 24th,28th,30th,32nd,34th and 36th weeks of gestation were compared. Pearson correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between s-AGEs and blood glucose control level. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves were used to analyze the specific critical value and predictive value of s-AGEs levels on the blood glucose control effect of GDM patients.Results:There were no significant differences in general characteristics between the two groups(P>0.05). The FPG,1 h PG,2 h PG and s-AGEs levels in the study group were higher than those in the control group at the 24th,28th,30th,32nd,34th and 36th weeks of gestation, and the TIR were lower than those in the control group(P all <0.05). The s-AGEs level in the study group increased with the increase of gestational weeks, and among them, the differences between the 24th week and the 28th week of gestation, the 30th week and the 32nd week of gestation, and the 34th week and the 36th week of gestation were statistically significant(P<0.05). Among the study group, the s-AGEs level in patients whose blood glucose control did not meet the standard increased with the increase of gestational weeks, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05),and were higher than those whose blood glucose control reached the standard at the 24th,28th,30th,32nd,34th and 36th weeks of gestation(P<0.05). The Pearson correlation analysis results showed that the s-AGEs levels in GDM patients at the 24th,28th,30th,32nd,34th and 36th weeks of gestation were positively correlated with FPG,1 h PG,and 2 h PG respectively, and negatively correlated with TIR(P all <0.05). The ROC analysis results showed that the critical values for predicting the blood glucose control effect in GDM patients based on s-AGEs values at the 24th,28th,30th,32nd,34th and 36th weeks of gestation were 8.60 U/mg, 8.74 U/mg, 8.88 U/mg, 8.95 U/mg, 9.34 U/mg and 9.57 U/mg, respectively. The area under the ROC curve(AUC) of blood glucose control effect in GDM patients predicted by s-AGEs levels at each gestational week was higher than those predicted separately(P<0.05).Conclusions:Compared to healthy pregnant women, the s-AGEs levels of GDM patients at the 24th,28th,30th,32nd,34th and 36th weeks of gestation were all increased, and the s-AGEs levels were related to the patient's blood glucose control level. The combined detection of s-AGEs levels at the above gestational weeks has a high predictive value for the blood glucose control effect in GDM patients.
[1] Mohan S,Egan AM.Diagnosis and treatment of hyperglycemia in pregnancy:Type 2 diabetes mellitus and gestational diabetes[J].Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am,2024,53:335-347.
[2] Lin J,Horswell R,Chu S,et al.Trends in the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus among the medicaid population before and during the COVID-19 pandemic[J].J Womens Health (Larchmt),2024,33:1276-1282.
[3] 彭柱青,阎小蓉,向舒.脂肪因子ISM1、WISP1与妊娠期糖尿病患者血糖控制和妊娠结局的关系[J].生殖医学杂志,2025,34:321-327.
[4] Chen Y,Meng Z,Li Y,et al.Advanced glycation end products and reactive oxygen species:uncovering the potential role of ferroptosis in diabetic complications[J].Mol Med,2024,30:141.
[5] Qiu S,Wu X,Wu Q,et al.Pharmacological action of baicalin on gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant animals induced by streptozotocin via AGE-RAGE signaling pathway[J].Appl Biochem Biotechnol,2024,196:1636-1651.
[6] Calixto PS,Ferraz FC,Dutra GC,et al.Exploring saliva as a sample for non-invasive glycemic monitoring in diabetes:A scoping review.Biomedicines[J].Biomedicines,2025,13:713.
[7] 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组,中华医学会围产医学分会,中国妇幼保健协会妊娠合并糖尿病专业委员会.妊娠期高血糖诊治指南(2022)[第一部分][J].中华妇产科杂志,2022,57:3-12.
[8] Moholdt T.Diet,exercise and gestational diabetes mellitus[J].Nutrients,2023,15:2251.
[9] Sch?fer-Graf U,Laubner K,Hummel S,et al.Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM),diagnostics,therapy and follow-up care[J].Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes,2023,131:13-23.
[10] Kautzky-Willer A,Winhofer Y,Kiss H,et al.Gestational diabetes mellitus (Update 2023)[J].Wien Klin Wochenschr,2023,135(Suppl 1):115-128.
[11] Jancev M,Vissers TACM,Visseren FLJ,et al.Continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 2 diabetes:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Diabetologia,2024,67:798-810.
[12] Kato S,Matsumura T,Sugawa H,et al.Correlation between serum advanced glycation end-products and vascular complications in patient with type 2 diabetes[J].Sci Rep,2024,14:18722.
[13] Bansal S,Burman A,Tripathi AK.Advanced glycation end products:Key mediator and therapeutic target of cardiovascular complications in diabetes[J].World J Diabetes,2023,14:1146-1162.
[14] Lee J,Yun JS,Ko SH.Advanced glycation end products and their effect on vascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus[J].Nutrients,2022,14:3086.
[15] Shen CY,Lu CH,Cheng CF,et al.Advanced glycation end-products acting as immunomodulators for chronic inflammation,inflammaging and carcinogenesis in patients with diabetes and immune-related diseases[J].Biomedicines,2024,12:1699.
[16] Li S,Yang H.Relationship between advanced glycation end products and gestational diabetes mellitus[J].J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2019,32:2783-2789.
[17] ?im?ek Tanin ?,Kara M,Engin-üstün Y,et al.Comparison of glucose degradation product and receptor levels in diabetic and normal pregnancy[J].J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc,2021,22:127-131.
基本信息:
中图分类号:R714.256
引用信息:
[1]黄静,赵雪飘,杜娟.唾液晚期糖基化终产物用于无创监测妊娠期糖尿病血糖控制:妊娠特异性临界值体系建立[J].生殖医学杂志,2026,35(01):64-70.
基金信息:
宿迁市第一人民医院科研专项(SY202210)
2026-01-15
2026-01-15