| 310 | 9 | 73 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的探讨卵巢储备功能减退(DOR)患者行体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)新鲜移植周期临床妊娠结局的可能影响因素。方法回顾性分析251例新鲜移植周期DOR患者的临床资料,根据促排卵方案、年龄分为4组:年龄小于35岁使用长方案105例、短方案53例;年龄35岁以上使用长方案者37例、短方案56例。比较各组患者的基础FSH值、窦卵泡数、卵巢反应情况、子宫内膜厚度、促排卵情况及妊娠结局,并比较移植D3卵裂期胚胎组及D5囊胚期胚胎组的临床妊娠结局。结果 (1)年龄<35岁患者:长方案组较短方案组,移植日内膜厚度[(12.20±2.39)vs.(11.27±2.42)mm]、获卵数[(6.50±2.75)vs.(4.80±2.48)]、受精数[(5.02±2.43)vs.(3.74±2.19)]、卵裂数[(4.92±2.41)vs.(3.64±2.16)]、优胚数[(1.97±1.86)vs.(1.23±1.38)]及冷冻胚胎数[(1.18±1.54)vs.(0.60±1.08)]均显著增高(P<0.05);(2)年龄≥35岁:长方案组受精数显著高于短方案组[(4.92±2.27)vs.(3.86±2.06)](P<0.05);(3)相同促排方案不同年龄组比较:长方案组随着年龄的增加,Gn总量[(3 184.30±1 262.12)vs.(3 878.03±1 466.53)U]显著增加(P<0.05),而获卵数、受精数、卵裂数、冷冻胚胎数均减少,但无统计学差异(P>0.05);短方案组两个年龄组比较各临床指标均无统计学差异(P>0.05);(4)各年龄组长方案较短方案,以及各方案组年轻者较年长者,胚胎种植率及临床妊娠率较高、流产率较低,但均无统计学差异(P>0.05);(5)移植D3卵裂期胚胎或D5囊胚期胚胎的妊娠结局未见统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论 DOR患者在促排卵治疗时,选择长方案可能更有利于改善助孕结局;DOR患者随着年龄的增加临床结局趋于下降;在获卵少的情况下建议选择卵裂期优质胚胎移植。
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the possible factors affecting the clinical outcome of fresh transplantation cycle in IVF in the patients with ovarian reserve dysfunction(DOR).Methods: The data of 251 controlled ovarian stimulation cycles were retrospectively analyzed.According to ovulation protocol and age,the patients were divided into four groups:105 patients with long protocol &53 patients with short protocol in the patients less than 35 years;37 patients with long protocol and 56 patients with short protocol in the patients over 35 years.The basic FSH levels,number of antral follicle,response of ovarian stimulation,endometrial thickness,outcome of ovulation induction and pregnancy were compared among the groups.The clinical pregnancy outcomes were also compared between D3 cleavage stage embryo group and D5 blastocyst stage embryo group.Results:In the patients less than 35 years,endometrial thickness[(12.20±2.39)vs.(11.27±2.42)mm],the numbers of oocytes retrieval[(6.50±2.75)vs.(4.8±2.48)],fertilization [(5.02±2.43)vs.(3.74±2.19)],cleavage[(4.92±2.41)vs.(3.64±2.16)],high-quality embryos[(1.97±1.86)vs.(1.23±1.38)],and frozen embryos [(1.18±1.54)vs.(0.60±1.08)]in long protocol were significantly higher than those in short protocol(P<0.05).In the patients over 35 years,the number of fertilization in long protocol was significantly higher than short protocol [(4.92±2.27)vs.(3.86±2.06)](P <0.05).Between the two age group,there were no statistical differences in the implantation rate,clinical pregnancy rate,abortion rate(P>0.05).Comparison of different age groups in same protocol,the total amount of gonadotropin(Gn)used was significantly higher[(3 184.30±1 262.12)vs.(3 878.03±1 466.53)U](P<0.05),and the numbers of oocytes retrieval,fertilization,cleavage,frozen embryos were reduced,but no significant difference(P>0.05)along with the increase of age in long protocol.There were no significant differences in the clinical parameters in short protocol(P>0.05).There were no significant differences in embryo implantation rate,clinical pregnancy rate and abortion rate between the short protocol and long protocol for each age group and between the younger group and the elder group in each protocol group(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the clinical outcome between transplanted D3 cleavage stage embryo and D5 blastocyst stage embryo(P>0.05).Conclusions: The long-term protocol might be more beneficial in improving ovulation outcomes for DOR patients.The clinical outcomes tended to decrease with increasing age in DOR patients.It is recommended to choose high-quality embryo transfer at the time of cleavage when the number of oocytes retrieval is low.
[1]Cohen J,Chabbert-Buffet N,Darai E.Diminished ovarian reserve,premature ovarian failure,poor ovarian responder-a plea for universal definitions[J].J Assist Reprod Genet,2015,32:1709-1712.
[2]Jahromi BN,Sadeghi S,Alipour S,et al.Effect of melatonin on the outcome of assisted reproductive technique cycles in women with diminished ovarian reserve:a double-blinded randomized clinical trial[J].Iran J Med Sci,2017,42:73-78.
[3]Gardner DK,Lane M,Stevens J,et al.Blastocyst score affect implantation and pregnancy outcome:towards a single blastocyst transfer[J].Fertil Steril,2000,73:1155-1158.
[4]Yun BH,Kim G,Park SH,et al.In vitro fertilization outcome in women with diminished ovarian reserver[J].Obstet Gynecol Sci,2017,60:46-52.
[5]Kyrou D,Kolibianakis EM,Venetis CA,et al.How to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization:a systematic review and metaanalysis[J].Fertil Steril,2009,91:749-766.
[6]Siristatidis CS,Gibreel A,Basios G,et al.Gonadotrophinreleasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary suppression in assisted reproduction[DB/OL].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2015,(11):CD006919.
[7]Revelli A,Chiado A,Dalmasso P,et al.“Mild”vs.“long”protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in patients with expected poor ovarian responsiveness undergoing in vitro fertilization(IVF):a large prospective randomized trial[J].J Assist Reprod Genet,2014,31:809-815.
[8]Shanbhag S,Aucott L,Bhattacharya S,et al.Interventions for“poor responders”to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation(COH)in in vitro fertilization(IVF)[DB/OL].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2007,(24):CD004379.
[9]Pal L,Jindal S,Witt BR,et al.Less is more:increased gonadotropin use for ovarian stimulation adversely influences clinical pregnancy and live birth after in vitro fertilization[J].Fertil Steril,2008,89:1694-1701.
[10]Lekamge DN,Lane M,Gilchrist RB,et al.Increased gonadotropin stimulation does not improve IVF outcomes in patients with predicted poor ovarian reserve[J].J Assist Reprod Genet,2008,25:515-521.
[11]唐静.不同促排卵方法对卵巢储备功能下降患者的疗效[J].实用临床医药杂志,2016,20:96-99.
[12]Madani T,Ashrafi M,Yeganeh LM.Comparison of different stimulation protocols efficacy in poor responders undergoing IVF:a retrospective study[J].Gynecol Endocrinol,2012,28:102-105.
[13]李元,龚斐.改良超长方案在卵巢低反应患者促排卵治疗中的应用[J].生殖医学杂志,2016,25:681-685.
[14]Dakhly DM,Bayoumi YA,Gad Allah SH.Which is the best IVF/ICSI protocol to be used in poor responders receiving growth hormone as an adjuvant treatment?A prospective randomized trial[J].Gynecol Endocrinol,2016,32:116-119.
[15]刘珊,师娟子.妇女年龄和卵巢储备与反应的关系[J].生殖医学杂志,2016,25,879-883.
[16]Marquard K,Westphal L,Milki A,et al.Etiology of recurrent pregnancy loss in women over the age of 35years[J].Fertil Steril,2010,94:1473-1477.
[17]Kato K,Ueno S,Yabuuchi A,et al.Women’s age and embryo developmental speed accurately predict clinical pregnancy after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer[J/OL].Reprod Biomed Online,2014,29:411-416.
[18]庞丽娥,乔宗惠,吴丽敏,等.不同年龄卵巢储备功能下降患者体外受精胚胎移植临床结局比较[J].生殖与避孕,2016,36:945-949.
[19]刘玲,许蓬,杨逸尘,等.卵裂期与囊胚期胚胎移植妊娠安全性和出生性别比的比较[J].生殖医学杂志,2017,26:640-645.
基本信息:
中图分类号:R714.8
引用信息:
[1]朱静,周怡然,陈蓓丽,等.卵巢储备功能减退患者新鲜移植周期结局分析[J].生殖医学杂志,2018,27(01):5-10.
基金信息:
安徽省高校自然科学研究项目重点项目(KJ2016A320)
2018-01-12
2018-01-12