| 222 | 4 | 77 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 分析先兆流产合并绒毛膜下血肿(SCH)患者发生流产和早产的危险因素,并基于危险因素建立列线图模型。方法 回顾性分析2021年6月至2023年6月银川国龙骨科医院收治的147例先兆流产合并SCH孕妇临床资料,根据妊娠结局分为足月分娩组(n=101)、流产组(n=32)和早产组(n=14)。采用多因素Logistic回归分析先兆流产合并SCH患者流产和早产的危险因素,建立列线图预测模型,并对模型预测性能进行验证。结果 多因素分析结果显示,SCH诊断孕周[OR=1.216,95%CI(1.044,1.416),P=0.012]、阴道流血持续时间[OR=0.869,95%CI(0.799,0.945),P=0.001]、血肿持续时间[OR=0.882,95%CI(0.790,0.984),P=0.024]、血肿体积[OR=0.964,95%CI(0.934,0.995),P=0.025]是流产的预测因素,下腹痛[OR=0.140,95%CI(0.028,0.693),P=0.016]、血肿持续时间[OR=0.741,95%CI(0.616,0.892),P=0.001]、血肿体积[OR=0.943,95%CI(0.901,0.988),P=0.013]是早产的危险因素。列线图模型预测流产和早产的曲线下面积分别为0.871和0.896,特异度分别为64.36%和80.20%,敏感度分别为100.00%和85.71%,约登指数分别为0.644和0.659。Hosmer-Lemeshow检验分析结果显示模型预测值和实际值之间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论 基于危险因素建立的列线图模型对先兆流产合并SCH患者流产和早产具有一定预测价值,方便医护人员采取医疗干预措施。
Abstract:Objective:To explore the risk factors of abortion and premature delivery in threatened abortion patients with subchorionic hematoma(SCH),and establish a nomogram model based on the risk factors.Methods:Using a retrospective analysis method, clinical data of 147 threatened abortion patients with SCH from Yinchuang Guolong Orthopedic Hospital between June 2021 and June 2023 were collected. The patients were assigned to term delivery group(n=101),abortion group(n=32)and premature delivery group(n=14). The risk factors of abortion and premature delivery were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression, and a nomogram model was established, the predictive performance of the model was verified.Results:The results of multivariate logistic regression showed that the gestational age of SCH diagnosis[OR=1.216,95%CI(1.044,1.416),P=0.012],the duration of vaginal bleeding[OR=0.869,95%CI(0.799,0.945),P=0.001],the duration of hematoma existence[OR=0.882,95%CI(0.790,0.984),P=0.024],hematoma volume[OR=0.964,95%CI(0.934,0.995),P=0.025] were factors for predicting abortion. Hypogastralgia[OR=0.140,95%CI(0.028,0.693),P=0.016],the duration of hematoma existence[OR=0.741,95%CI(0.616,0.892),P=0.001],hematoma volume[OR=0.943,95%CI(0.901,0.988),P=0.013] were factors for predicting premature delivery. The areas under the curve of nomogram for predicting abortion and premature delivery were 0.871 and 0.896,the specificity was 64.36% and 80.20%,the sensitivity was 100.00% and 85.71%,and the Youden index was 0.644 and 0.659,respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the predicted and actual values of the model(P>0.05).Conclusions:A risk factors-based nomogram model has certain predictive value for abortion and premature delivery of threatened abortion patients with SCH,which can facilitate medical staff to take active medical interventions.
[1] Ohly NT,Khoury R.Threatened periviable delivery and abortion:clinical considerations[J].Clin Obstet Gynecol,2023,66:698-705.
[2] Inman ER,Miranian DC,Stevenson MJ,et al.Outcomes of subchorionic hematoma-affected pregnancies in the infertile population[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2022,159:743-750.
[3] 高尚,陈莎.绒毛膜下血肿对妊娠结局影响的研究进展[J].现代妇产科进展,2023,32:224-227.
[4] 张春芳,王芳,牟方祥,等.免疫因素与绒毛膜下血肿关系的研究进展[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2023,15:32-36.
[5] 宋瑶,陈立霞,李燕,等.服务信息管理系统结合延续干预对先兆流产患者的应用价值[J].河北医药,2022,44:2815-2817,2821.
[6] Günay T,Yard?mc? OD.How does subchorionic hematoma in the first trimester affect pregnancy outcomes?[J].Arch Med Sci,2021,18:639-646.
[7] Huang H,Han H,Xie H,et al.Subchorionic hematoma association with pregnancy complications and outcomes in the third trimester[J].J Pers Med,2023,13:479.
[8] 谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].第8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:126.
[9] 史欣,杜岚,苏青,等.绒毛膜下与胎盘后宫腔内血肿的临床特点及妊娠结局的对比研究[J].中国医师进修杂志,2019,42:900-903.
[10] 卫炜,李国静,郭秋云,等.绒毛膜下血肿的临床特点及其妊娠结局分析[J].北京医学,2021,43:46-48.
[11] Wang X,Shi W,Shi J,et al.Relationship between the volume ratio of subchorionic hematoma to gestation SAC in first-trimester and pregnancy outcome of patients with threatened abortion[J].J Coll Physicians Surg Pak,2022,32:1415-1419.
[12] Xu T,Lun W,He Y.Subchorionic hematoma:Research status and pathogenesis(Review)[J].Med Int(Lond),2024,4:10.
[13] 张碧云,陈颖悦,胡阳,等.早孕期胚胎绒毛膜下血肿与下生殖道感染的关系[J].实用医学杂志,2023,39:451-455.
[14] 郑杨凡,刘继红,庹瑞兰,等.绒毛膜下血肿的病因及研究进展[J].中国卫生标准管理,2022,13:189-193.
[15] Elmas B,?zgü BS,Zorlu U,et al.Do first-trimester subchorionic hematomas affect pregnancy outcomes?[J].Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol,2023,227:31-35.
[16] 沈冬怡,孙忻,张伟.绒毛膜下血肿与妊娠结局相关性研究进展[J].生殖医学杂志,2022,31:1156-1160.
[17] West BT,Kavoussi PK,Odenwald KC,et al.Factors associated with subchorionic hematoma formation in pregnancies achieved via assisted reproductive technologies[J].J Assist Reprod Genet,2020,37:305-309.
[18] 吴晓荣,王双双,曹意苒,等.孕早期先兆流产合并绒毛膜下血肿患者血清Th1/Th2细胞因子与孕酮、β-HCG水平及妊娠结局的关系[J].海南医学,2023,34:1290-1294.
[19] Yao F,Song X,Ding H,et al.Subchorionic hematomas in early pregnancies[J].Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol,2022,61:1097.
[20] Anderson KL,Jimenez PT,Omurtag KR,et al.Outcomes of in vitro fertilization pregnancies complicated by subchorionic hematoma detected on first-trimester ultrasound[J].F S Rep,2020,1:149-153.
基本信息:
中图分类号:R714.21
引用信息:
[1]徐丽华,刘晓芳,雷鸣.先兆流产合并绒毛膜下血肿患者不同妊娠结局预测模型的建立[J].生殖医学杂志,2025,34(03):306-314.
基金信息:
宁夏回族自治区科技惠民专项项目(2022CMG03047)
2024-09-06
2024
2024-10-11
2025-02-09
2025
1
2025-03-15
2025-03-15