nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 11, v.33 1470-1477
基于胚胎动力学的胚胎正常致密化预测模型构建与验证
基金项目(Foundation): 河北省医学科学研究课题计划(20240234)
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

目的 通过分析胚胎动力学和胚胎致密化的相关性,构建胚胎正常致密化的预测模型并加以验证。方法 选取2023年1—6月在邢台不孕不育专科医院生殖医学中心行IVF-ET治疗患者的394枚胚胎作为研究对象,采用留出法按照常用比例(8∶2)分为训练集(315枚)和验证集(79枚),训练集胚胎根据授精后(92±2)h(第4天)有无致密化分为两组:未发生任何致密化的为未致密化组(122枚),完全致密化的为致密化组(193枚),比较各组患者的临床资料。采用多因素Logistic回归分析胚胎致密化的影响因素,建立第4天胚胎正常致密化的预测模型。通过校准曲线、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和决策曲线(DCA)分别在训练集和验证集中进行内部和外部验证,以评估预测模型的精确度、区分度和临床适用性。结果 训练集和验证集胚胎的动力学参数(tPNa、tPNf、t2、t3、t4、t5、t6、t7、t8、CC2和S2等)及胚胎致密化比例比较均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。致密化组和未致密化组间胚胎t3、t6、t7、t8和t8-tPNf比较均无显著性差异(P>0.05);与未致密化组比较,致密化组胚胎tPNa、tPNf、t2、t4和S2显著缩短,而t5、CC2和t5-tPNf显著延长(P均<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,tPNa[OR=0.86,95%CI(0.76,0.99),P=0.031]和t2[OR=0.64,95%CI(0.56,0.73),P<0.001]是胚胎致密化的独立负向影响因素,t5[OR=1.18,95%CI(1.12,1.24),P<0.001]是胚胎致密化的独立正向影响因素。基于上述影响因素建立了列线图致密化预测模型,经Bootstrap法验证显示预测发生率与实际发生率曲线分布相接近,内部验证相对平均误差为0.016,外部验证相对平均误差为0.079,模型校准度良好。ROC曲线结果显示,内部验证ROC曲线下面积为[0.808(0.761,0.855)],外部验证ROC曲线下面积为[0.810(0.739,0.880)]。DCA曲线结果显示,在训练集中,如果阈值概率在10%~87%时,使用列线图预测胚胎致密化会产生较高的临床净效益;在验证集中,当阈值概率在10%~75%时,会产生良好的临床净效益。结论 tPNa、t2和t5是胚胎致密化的独立影响因素;基于此构建的致密化预测模型能有效预测体外受精第4天胚胎正常致密化的发生,具有一定的临床推广价值。

Abstract:

Objective:To analyze and validate the correlation between morphokinetic parameters and embryonic compaction by constructing a nomogram predictive model.Methods:A total of 394 embryos from patients undergoing IVF-ET at Reproductive Center of Xingtai Infertility Specialist Hospital from January 2023 to June 2023 were recruited. The embryos were divided into a training set(n=315) and a validation set(n=79) according to the leave-out method with the usual ratio(8∶2). Based on the presence or absence of compaction on the fourth day [(92±2)h],the embryos were divided into two groups in the training set as no-compaction group(no compaction occurred, n=122) and compaction group(complete compaction occurred, n=193). The clinical data of the two groups in the training set and the validation set were analyzed. The risk factors for embryonic compaction were determined through multivariate logistic regression analysis and a predictive model for the normal embryonic compaction on the fourth day was established. The accuracy, discriminatory, and clinical applicability of the predictive model were evaluated through calibration curves, the receiver operating characteristic(ROC),and decision curve analysis(DCA) in the training set and validation set.Results:There were no significant differences in the dynamic parameters(tPNa, tPNf, t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8,CC2,S2,etc.) and embryonic compaction ratio between the training and validation sets(P>0.05). There were no significant differences in embryo t3,t6,t7,t8,and t8-tPNf between the compaction group and the no-compaction groups(P>0.05). Compared with the no-compaction group, the embryos in the compaction group showed significant shortening of tPNa, tPNf, t2,t4,and S2,while t5,CC2,and t5-tPNf were significantly prolonged(all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that tPNa [OR=0.86,95%CI(0.76,0.99),P=0.031] and t2 [OR=0.64,95%CI(0.56,0.73),P<0.001] were independent negative influencing factors, while t5 [OR=1.18,95%CI(1.12,1.24), P<0.001] was independent positive influencing factor for successful embryonic compaction. Based on these factors, a column chart compaction predictive model was established. The Bootstrap method showed that the distribution of the predicted occurrence rate was similar to the actual occurrence rate curve, and the relative average error for internal validation was 0.016,and the relative average error for external validation was 0.079,indicating good model calibration. The area under the ROC curve was [0.808(0.761,0.855)] in the internal validation and that of [0.810(0.739,0.880)] in the external validation. The DCA curve results showed that in the training set, using the column line chart to predict the embryonic compaction would result in higher net clinical benefits when the threshold probability was between 10% and 87%. In the validation set, good clinical net benefits would be achieved when the threshold probability was between 10% and 75%.Conclusions:tPNa, t2 and t5 were independent influencing factors for successful embryonic compaction. The compaction predictive model based on morphokinetic parameters can effectively predict the occurrence rate of successful compaction on the fourth day of IVF embryos and obtained clinical net benefits.

参考文献

[1] Orvieto R,Jonish-Grossman A,Maydan SA,et al.Cleavage-stage human embryo arrest,is it embryo genetic composition or others?[J].Reprod Biol Endocrinol,2022,20:52.

[2] Wang W,Zhao M,Zuo H,et al.Evaluate the developmental competence of human 8-cell embryos by single-cell RNA sequencing[J].Reprod Fertil,2023,4:e220119.

[3] Fabozzi G,Alteri A,Rega E,et al.Morphological assessment on day 4 and its prognostic power in selecting viable embryos for transfer[J].Zygote,2016,24:477-484.

[4] Rienzi L,Cimadomo D,Delgado A,et al.Time of morulation and trophectoderm quality are predictors of a live birth after euploid blastocyst transfer:a multicenter study[J].Fertil Steril,2019,112:1080-1093.

[5] Lagalla C,Coticchio G,Sciajno R,et al.Alternative patterns of partial embryo compaction:prevalence,morphokinetic history and possible implications[J/OL].Reprod Biomed Online,2020,40:347-354.

[6] 毛献宝,王世凯,谭卫红,等.培养液对胚胎早期发育动态表型和动力学参数的影响:一项time-lapse研究[J].中华生殖与避孕杂志,2022,42:50-57.

[7] 朱家红,熊顺,武丽红,等.整倍体胚胎形态动力学参数对单囊胚移植妊娠结局的影响[J].中华生殖与避孕杂志,2023,43:898-903.

[8] Milewski R,Ku■,Kuczyńska A,et al.A predictive model for blastocyst formation based on morphokinetic parameters in time-lapse monitoring of embryo development[J].J Assist Reprod Genet,2015,32:571-579.

[9] Barnes J,Brendel M,Gao VR,et al.A non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy:a retrospective model development and validation study[J].Lancet Digit Health,2023,5:e28-e40.

[10] McQueen DB,Pavone ME.Does embryo morphokinetics aid in embryo selection among euploid embryos?[J].Fertil Steril,2019,112:1048.

[11] Urich M,Ugur MR,Li F,et al.Comparison of two culture media on morphokinetics and ploidy status of sibling embryos[J].Zygote,2022,30:410-415.

[12] Asami M,Lam B,Ma MK,et al.Human embryonic genome activation initiates at the one-cell stage[J].Cell Stem Cell,2022,29:209-216.

[13] 张春丰,褚庆森,石晓梅,等.脑胶质瘤术后谵妄护理预警模型的构建与验证[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2022,31:996-1001.

[14] Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology.The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment:proceedings of an expert meeting[J].Hum Reprod,2011,26:1270-1283.

[15] Gardner DK,Lane M,Stevens J,et al.Reprint of:Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome:towards a single blastocyst transfer[J].Fertil Steril,2019,112:e81-e84.

[16] van Duijn L,Rousian M,Kramer CS,et al.The impact of culture medium on morphokinetics of cleavage stage embryos:an observational study[J].Reprod Sci,2022,29:2179-2189.

[17] Diamond MP,Willman S,Chenette P,et al.The clinical need for a method of identification of embryos destined to become a blastocyst in assisted reproductive technology cycles[J].J Assist Reprod Genet,2012,29:391-396.

[18] Salih M,Austin C,Warty RR,et al.Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists:a systematic review[J].Hum Reprod Open,2023,2023:hoad031.

[19] Cruz M,Garrido N,Herrero J,et al.Timing of cell division in human cleavage-stage embryos is linked with blastocyst formation and quality[J/OL].Reprod Biomed Online,2012,25:371-381.

[20] Meseguer M,Herrero J,Tejera A,et al.The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation[J].Hum Reprod,2011,26:2658-2671.

基本信息:

中图分类号:R714.8

引用信息:

[1]耿亚松,郑波,戴芳芳,等.基于胚胎动力学的胚胎正常致密化预测模型构建与验证[J].生殖医学杂志,2024,33(11):1470-1477.

基金信息:

河北省医学科学研究课题计划(20240234)

投稿时间:

2024-02-27

投稿日期(年):

2024

终审时间:

2024-10-07

终审日期(年):

2024

修回时间:

2024-05-11

审稿周期(年):

1

发布时间:

2024-11-15

出版时间:

2024-11-15

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文