| 180 | 6 | 53 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 探讨宫内节育器(IUD)对育龄妇女再生育时妊娠结局的影响。方法 采用回顾性队列研究,分析2016年1月至2018年12月在我院分娩二孩的15 031例研究对象的临床资料。根据避孕方式不同分为两组:采用IUD避孕的为IUD组(n=7 452),采用避孕套避孕的为避孕套组(n=7 579),比较两组的一般资料和停用避孕措施后的妊娠结局。由于年龄和带器时长均可能是妊娠结局的影响因素,又将IUD组根据年龄不同分为<35岁和≥35岁两个年龄段;按照带器时长不同分为3个亚组:<5年组、5~10年组和>10年组,比较不同年龄段各亚组取出IUD后再次妊娠时的妊娠结局。采用多因素Logistic回归分析不同因素对妊娠结局的影响。结果 IUD组和避孕套组的年龄、体质量指数(BMI)分布、第一胎分娩方式、第一胎异常分娩结局、未使用IUD和避孕套前流产次数、妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)发生率比较均无显著性差异(P>0.05);IUD组的妊娠期高血压发生率显著低于避孕套组(P<0.05)。停用避孕措施后,两组间流产次数、第二胎分娩方式、自然流产、稽留流产、发育异常引产、出生缺陷、死胎发生率比较均无显著性差异(P>0.05);IUD组的第二胎分娩孕周<37周、第二胎出生体重<2 500 g发生率显著高于避孕套组(P<0.05)。在<35岁年龄段中,各IUD带器时长亚组间流产、出生缺陷、死胎、早产、足月低体重儿、巨大儿发生率比较均无显著性差异(P>0.05);在≥35岁年龄段中,各IUD带器时长亚组间流产、出生缺陷、死胎、早产、足月低体重儿、巨大儿发生率比较亦无显著性差异(P>0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄[OR=1.054,95%CI(1.038,1.069),P=0.000]、流产1~2次[OR=1.591,95%CI(1.377,1.840),P=0.000]、流产≥3次[OR=5.841,95%CI(4.914,6.944),P=0.000]、妊娠期高血压疾病[OR=1.521,95%CI(1.060,2.183),P=0.041]和BMI≥24.0 kg/m2[OR=1.780,95%CI(1.376,2.301),P=0.000]是妊娠结局的危险因素,而是否使用IUD、GDM和BMI<18.5 kg/m2对妊娠结局无显著影响(P>0.05)。结论 育龄妇女停用IUD后再生育结局受到年龄、流产史、妊娠期高血压疾病、肥胖多种因素影响,但未发现IUD及带器时长影响妊娠结局,故IUD取出后可以放心生育。
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the effect of intrauterine contraceptive device(IUD) on the pregnancy outcome of women of childbearing age.Methods:A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on the clinical data of 15 031 patients who delivered the second child in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2018. The patients were divided into two groups according to different contraceptive methods: IUD group(n=7 452) and condom group(n=7 579). The general data and pregnancy outcomes after contraceptive withdrawal were compared between the two groups. Considering that age and the duration with IUD were the influencing factors of pregnancy outcome, the IUD group was divided into the age <35 years group and ≥35 years group, and 3 subgroups according to the duration with IUD:<5 years group, 5-10 years group and >10 years group. The pregnancy outcomes of re-preproduction after IUD removal were compared among the subgroups of different age groups. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze the influence of different factors on pregnancy outcome.Results:There were no significant differences in age, the distribution of body mass index(BMI),delivery mode of the first birth, abnormal delivery outcome of the first birth, number of abortions before using IUD and condom and the incidence of gestational diabetes between the two groups with the different contraceptives(P>0.05). The incidence of gestational hypertension in IUD group was significantly lower than that in condom group(P<0.05). After discontinuing contraceptives use, there were no significant differences in the number of abortions, second delivery mode, spontaneous abortion, missed abortion, induced abortion with abnormal development, birth defects and stillbirth between the two groups(P>0.05). The gestational age(<37 weeks) and birth weight(<2 500 g) of the second fetus in IUD group were significantly higher than those in condom group(P<0.05). In the group <35 years old, the incidences of abortion, birth defects, stillbirth, premature birth, low birth weight to full term, and macrosomia were not significantly different among the subgroups(P>0.05). In the group ≥35 years old, the abortion, birth defects, stillbirth, premature birth, low birth weight to full term, and macrosomia were not significantly different among the subgroups(P>0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age[OR=1.054,95%CI(1.038,1.069),P=0.000],abortion 1-2 times[OR=1.591,95%CI(1.377,1.840),P=0.000],abortion times ≥3[OR=5.841,95%CI(4.914,6.944),P=0.000],gestational hypertension[OR=1.521,95%CI(1.060,2.183),P=0.041] and BMI≥24.0 kg/m2[OR=1.780,95%CI(1.376,2.301),P=0.000] were the risk factors for pregnancy outcome, while IUD usage, gestational diabetes mellitus and BMI<18.5 kg/m2 had no significant influence on pregnancy outcome(P>0.05).Conclusions:Age, abortion history and gestational hypertension are the factors influencing outcome of pregnancy after IUD withdrawal. However, IUD usage and duration do not affect the pregnancy outcome, so it is safe to give birth after removing IUD.
[1] Andreae MH,Andreae DA.Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery:a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Br J Anaesth,2013,111:711-720.
[2] 张爱丹.放置宫内节育器对输卵管阻塞性不孕的影响[J].天津医药,2017,45:76-78.
[3] 胡世福,夏伟,朱长虹.含铜宫内节育器异常出血不良反应机制的研究进展[J].中华生殖与避孕杂志,2021,41:702-704.
[4] Jatlaoui TC,Riley HE,Curtis KM.The safety of intrauterine device among young women:a systematic review[J].Contraception,2017,95:17-39.
[5] 贾玉芳.“单独二孩”政策对昆山市育龄妇女生育意愿的潜在影响分析[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2014,22:514-518,525.
[6] 刘江坤,周瑞争,张素芝,等.河北省12775例宫内节育器不良反应发生情况及影响因素调查[J].中国妇幼保健,2015,30:1226-1229.
[7] Diedrich JT,Desai S,Zhao Q,et al.Association of short-term bleeding and cramping patterns with long-acting reversible contraceptive method satisfaction[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2015,212:50.e1-e8.
[8] 周荣生,柯旭.巨细胞病毒感染与自然流产及免疫细胞因子水平的关联性分析[J].中国免疫学杂志,2019,35:2272-2275.
[9] 郑瑞华.浅析宫内节育器引起子宫异常出血与人乳头瘤病毒感染关系[J].现代诊断与治疗,2015,26:854-855.
[10] 郑丽丽,郑丽媛,陈海英,等.高危型人乳头状瘤病毒、人巨细胞病毒、人疱疹病毒4型、解脲脲原体感染与宫颈病变的关系[J].中国妇幼保健,2017,32:37-39.
[11] 潘颖,韩小雪,李瑞满.人巨细胞病毒在妊娠期筛查中的意义[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2021,37:1012-1016.
[12] Tosun AK,Tosun I,Suer N.Comparison of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device with oral progestins in heavy menstrual bleeding(HMB) cases with uterine leiomyoma(LNG-IUD and oral progestin usage in myoma uteri)[J].Pak J Med Sci,2014,30:834-839.
[13] 王茜.已婚已育女性放置宫内节育器后生殖道感染的危险因素及对策分析[J].临床医学研究与实践,2021,6:22-24.
[14] 丁燕玲.阴道微生态失调与早产相关性研究进展[J].中国微生态学杂志,2018,30:1114-1116.
[15] Meirik O.Intrauterine devices - upper and lower genital tract infections[J].Contraception,2007,75:S41-47.
[16] 王瑜,张少静,张少娣,等.宫内病变、年龄与不孕症患者妊娠结局的相关性分析[J].中国临床医生杂志,2019,47:351-353.
[17] 王张燕.宫内节育器取出后生育能力恢复情况调查分析[J].滨州医学院学报,2017,40:308-309.
[18] 丁翠元,安茂伟,王蒙,等.取宫内节育器后再次妊娠结局及影响因素分析[J].中国生育健康杂志,2011,22:361-362.
[19] Kim SK,Romero R,Kusanovic JP,et al.The prognosis of pregnancy conceived despite the presence of an intrauterine device(IUD)[J].J Perinat Med,2010,38:45-53.
[20] Fulkerson Schaeffer S,Gimovsky AC,Aly H,et al.Pregnancy and delivery with an intrauterine device in situ:outcomes in the national inpatient sample databas[J].J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2019,32:798-803.
[21] 王玉楣,车映,李晓翠.关于采用宫内节育器避孕的调查[J].现代医学,2018,46:382-385.
[22] 卢秀霞,贾晓,袁萍,等.放置与未放置IUD子宫异常出血患者的子宫内膜病理变化对比分析[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2017,28:323-325.
[23] Pohjorantat E,Suhonen S,Mentula M,et al.Pregnancy outcomes following routine early provision of IUD after first trimester induced abortion-5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial[J].Reprod Sci,2020,27:66A.
基本信息:
中图分类号:R169.41
引用信息:
[1]沈立平,杨月华,潘林清,等.育龄妇女停用宫内节育器后妊娠结局的队列研究[J].生殖医学杂志,2022,31(08):1080-1086.
基金信息:
国家人口计生委计划生育药具不良反应监测中心开放基金(YJJC201801)
2021-12-27
2021
2022-04-09
2022-07-04
2022
1
2022-08-15
2022-08-15