nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
您当前所在位置: 首页> 文献列表> 由ART伦理案例引发的争议与考量
2017, 03, v.26 199-202
由ART伦理案例引发的争议与考量
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2017-03-15
出版时间: 2017-03-15
移动端阅读
摘要:

近年来,人类辅助生殖技术(ART)成为不孕患者主要的治疗方法之一,在为不孕夫妇解决疾患的同时,也不断涌现新的挑战。由某些伦理案例引发的事件与影响给生殖领域及社会层面带来诸多纷争,迫切需要在业内进行深入讨论来提升伦理认知与规范,为ART管理提供有力依据,同时期待进一步完善管理法规,媒体报道也须坚守理性和公正。

Abstract:

Human assisted reproductive technology(ART)has become one of the main methods for treatment of infertile patients in the recent years.In the treatment of infertile couples,many new challenges have been emerged at the same time.The events and influence incited by some ethical cases have brought many disputes to the reproductive field and society.These tricky issues deserve deeper discussion to provide evidence for the management of assisted reproductive technology and improve the related laws.In addition,media reports must also adhere to rational and justice.

参考文献

[1]Clarke GN.A.R.T.and history,1678-1978[J].Hum Reprod,2006,21:1645-1650.

[2]段金良,陈文月,于江,等.辅助生殖技术实施过程中常见的伦理矛盾及对策[J].中国医学伦理学,2012,25:31-33.

[3]范玲.重视高龄孕妇围分娩期的管理[J].实用妇产科杂志,2016,32:165-167.

[4]Kortman M,de Wert GM,Fauser BC,et al.Pregnancy at a later age with the help of oocyte donation[J].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd,2006,150:2591-2595.

[5]Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.Oocyte or embryo donation to women of advanced reproductive age:an Ethics Committee opinion[J].Fertil Steril,2016,106:e3-e7.

[6]Vincent-Rohfritsch A,Marszalek A,Santulli P,et al.Risk of perinatal complication and egg donation:Role of resorting to cross-border care?[J].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod(Paris),2016,45:866-875.

[7]Gruenbaum BF,Pinchover ZS,Lunenfeld E,et al.Ovum donation:examining the new Israeli law[J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2011,159:40-42.

[8]周利锋,郭立燕,杨婕,等.妇女围绝经期症状及保健需求调查[J].中国妇幼保健,2016,21:69-70.

[9]冯云.关于生殖医学伦理的争议与思考[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2010,26:793-795.

[10]中华人民共和国卫生部.人类辅助生殖技术管理办法[R].2001.

[11]Shapo HS.Frozen pre-embryos and the right to change one’s mind[J].Duke J Comp Intl Law,2002,12:75-103.

[12]Johnson EW.Frozen embryos:determining disposition through contract[J].Rutgers Law Rev,2003,55:793-820.

[13]Ethical issues in obstetrics and gynecology[R].London:The FIGO Commit tees for the Study of Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health,2009.

[14]香港人类科技管理局.生殖科技及胚胎研究实务守则[S].2002.

[15]席欣然,张金钟.美、英、法代孕法律规制的伦理思考[J].医学与哲学(人文社会医学版),2011,32:25-27.

基本信息:

中图分类号:R714.8;R-052

引用信息:

[1]冯云.由ART伦理案例引发的争议与考量[J].生殖医学杂志,2017,26(03):199-202.

发布时间:

2017-03-15

出版时间:

2017-03-15

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文